THE GAP DETECTOR ASSESSMENT
A practical way to find out whether something deserves a closer look.
The complimentary Gap Detector gives you a short, structured reading of how current, evidenced and responsive your partner oversight appears today.
It can indicate that your current approach is well supported. It can also highlight where incomplete evidence, inherited assumptions or inconsistent oversight may leave an important decision exposed.
No sensitive data | 10 minutes | 18 questions | Instant report
You do not need to know there is a problem before testing the evidence
A relationship may still be performing. You may be approaching an investment, renewal or prioritisation decision and want to know whether the view behind it remains reliable.
The Gap Detector is a proportionate first step and the entry point into the wider Oversight Gap system. It tests whether the way you manage your partner relationships could allow an oversight gap to open. It does not judge individual partners, and it does not assume that anything is wrong.
Gain insight into whether a gap could be forming | Complimentary | No sensitive data required |Report is your to retain.
A clear initial reading.
Not just a score.
Five category readings, what's driving each one, and where to look next.
01 Overall maturity level
Where you sit on a five-level model, from Assumption Led to Continuously Assured.
02 Five category scores
Change & Recalibration, Visibility & Evidence, Alignment & Accountability, Decision Exposure, and Warning Signals & Emerging Consequences, shown together on one view.
03 A breakdown behind each score
What's driving it, and how it shows up in practice.
04 A combined position
How your evidence base and ongoing review sit together.
05 A steer on what's next
Whether this is enough to act on, or worth a closer look.
Assess five areas of oversight.
Each category is assessed and scored independently, then brought together to establish the overall maturity level.
A clear reading of where oversight stands.
Each score sits on the same five-level scale, moving from a view built mainly on memory and individual judgement through to one that is tested and reassessed continuously as relationships change.
- Level 1 - Assumption Led
- Level 2 - Fragmented and Reactive
- Level 3 - Structured but Partially Tested
- Level 4 - Evidence Tested
- Level 5 - Continuously Assured
A clean result is as useful as one that flags a weakness. The assessment does not judge individual partners or confirm that anything is wrong. It provides an evidence-based indication of the strength of the oversight around them.
If the result supports the current view, it provides reassurance. If it highlights an area of uncertainty, it gives you a specific starting point for a deeper discussion.That consistency allows one reading to be trusted and several readings to be compared. It also creates a reliable baseline for reassessment.
A clear route from initial indication to a decision.
There is no automatic move into a paid engagement. The result identifies whether a further conversation could be useful; the decision, desired outcome, and required evidence determine what follows.
Gain insight into whether a gap could be forming | Complimentary | No sensitive data required |Report is your to retain.
Not sure if there could be something worth a closer look?
Begin with the decision, relationship or area of uncertainty that prompted the question.